Oh Tordelback, I really wished you hadn't egged him on! After all, Peterwolf said it best himself here:
This is just one example and i have indepth knowledge of the subject but this isnt the place to expand upon it.
I really don't know what control over reproduction Bill Gates is promoting through his philanthropic donations, but anything short of sterilization is emphatically
not eugenics. I have no problem at all with the promotion of condom use, especially in Africa where HIV infection is so common. Contraception is always controversial because it is generally the poorest and least well educated people of the world, and the poorest people in industrialized countries, who need to be given the most help to take control of their own reproductive capacities. Part of the problem for public relations is when those tasked with promoting contraception don't trust poor people to be reponsible enough to play an active part in controlling their own fertility, which leads social policy and health professionals to over-emphasize long-term fixes like implants and intra-uterine devices.
Did you see the most recent government information film in the UK? All it talks about is IUDs, implants and the pill, making contraception exclusively a woman's responsibility. Condoms are not mentioned once, except in the form of a bit of hard to read text at the end, and it implies that what condoms are for is prevented STIs, not babies. Where pills are mentioned, it's in the context of a lot of fiddling around having to do contraception every day - what a chore - so you'd be better of with something that lasts, and has to be administered by a health worker. "Contraception - you're just crap and useless, so get it done
for you" seems to be the underlying message.