no tv/films in star trek

[Mudcrab]

Mmmmmmmmm, Seveeeeeen.

Ah yes, splendid stuff. One of the best things that happened to Voyager, nay, Star Trek altogether was bringing in 7 of 9. And in true geeky style, I do believe that it's her acting that made the character, not just her looks (he says, while secretly drooling like a fool at the Unimatrix 0 episode).

He he, then there's Harry's dream. "Do you wish to procreate?"

Enough drooling, my designated shift is over, I shall return tomorrow once regeneration is complete!

[Trout]

Seven is mine. Hands off.

When I rule the universe, she will join Halo in my harem.

- Reality is the only alternative to Trout

[Nice Tom]

Here's a point. In 'Enterprise', the implication of the opening titles is that the eponymous ship is part of a long line of vessels carrying that name, including the space shuttle Enterprise. Now, this shuttle was named after the vessel from the original series. So the Enterprise of the original series is named after the Enterprise of the new series, which is named after- no, never mind, it's all very metafictional.

[judge dreddd]

when they first unveiled the enterprise shuttle, the door opened and out stepped kirk,mccoy,spock...not in costume i admit but top marks for nasa treckies...

[Mudcrab]

Ah, but wasn't the original Trek Enterprise named after the USS Enterprise, the US Navy's flagship? Kind of keeping the tradition of the flagship being called Enterprise. Considering the implications of the name, is that not against the philosophy of the Trek universe itself, now that money has been done away with and everyone lives in highly (technology) rich and well organised commune?

[Mudcrab]

Ok, I'll settle for Belanna (sp?), even with the bumpy heid!